The Citation Test: Is Your Website AI-Readable?
When someone asks ChatGPT or Perplexity to recommend an executive coach, does your website get cited or skipped? In 2025, AI engines have become the new gatekeepers of professional discovery, and most coaching websites are structurally invisible to them.
Share this post
The gap isn’t content quality. It’s technical architecture. Research shows that products with schema markup, structured data that tells machines what content means, appear 3-5 times more frequently in AI-generated recommendations than those without it. For high-ticket coaches competing in a crowded market, being AI-readable isn’t optional infrastructure anymore. It’s the difference between being found and being invisible.
How AI Engines Decide What to Cite
AI search engines don’t evaluate websites the way humans do. They parse structured signals that indicate authority, relevance, and trustworthiness, then synthesize that data into responses with citations. The mechanics vary by platform, and understanding those differences shapes optimization strategy.
ChatGPT typically cites 2-4 sources per response and prioritizes authoritative domains with clear E-E-A-T signals (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness). It favors content that demonstrates subject matter depth, professional credentials, and consistent publishing patterns. Without structured data telling ChatGPT “this is an expert profile” or “this is professional service content,” the algorithm treats your site like unstructured text, readable but not citable.
Perplexity takes a different approach. It cites 3-5 sources and heavily weights recency, preferring content published within the last six months. For coaches publishing essays, case studies, or thought leadership, this creates opportunity: fresh, well-structured content can outrank older, higher-authority competitors if it’s technically optimized for AI parsing.
Claude and other emerging engines follow similar patterns, they reward sites that make it easy for machines to understand context, relationships, and credibility. The common thread across all platforms: schema markup isn’t just an SEO tactic anymore. It’s the language AI speaks.
The Three Technical Requirements
Making your site AI-readable requires three layers of infrastructure, each addressing how algorithms evaluate content.
Structured data (schema markup) tells AI engines what your content represents, whether a page is a person profile, service offering, article, or review . Without it, AI treats your homepage, about page, and blog posts as undifferentiated text. With it, your site becomes a queryable database that AI can confidently cite. The performance difference is measurable: schema-enabled content sees 3-5x higher visibility in AI recommendations.
E-E-A-T signals communicate credibility. AI engines parse author bios, credentials, publication consistency, external links, and domain authority to assess whether a source is trustworthy. For coaches, this means clear authorship attribution on essays, visible credentials, and content that demonstrates expertise through depth rather than volume. Google’s AI search overview guidelines explicitly recommend optimizing for E-E-A-T because AI relies on these signals to filter sources.
Content freshness matters more in AI search than traditional SEO. Perplexity’s preference for recent content reflects a broader pattern: AI engines prioritize up-to-date information to avoid citing outdated perspectives. For coaching businesses, this means regular publishing isn’t just audience engagement, it’s technical infrastructure that keeps your site in AI rotation.
The Platform Reality Check
Not all website platforms make AI readiness achievable. Here’s how the major options compare for coaches building media-led businesses:
WordPress offers full technical control. Plugins like Yoast SEO and RankMath automatically generate schema markup for posts, pages, author profiles, and services. You can customize structured data, add FAQ schema, implement breadcrumbs, and control every technical element AI engines parse. For coaches serious about long-term visibility, WordPress provides the infrastructure to stay AI-readable as standards evolve.
Wix includes automatic structured data generation and built-in SEO tools that handle most schema requirements without manual coding. For coaches prioritizing ease of use over total control, Wix offers a solid middle ground, AI-readable out of the box with fewer customization options than WordPress.
Squarespace provides basic SEO functionality but limited schema markup capabilities. You can optimize meta descriptions and titles, but advanced structured data requires custom code injection. For design-first sites where AI discoverability isn’t the primary goal, Squarespace works. For coaches building authority through content, it’s a constraint.
Kajabi presents the most significant limitations. Multiple analyses highlight issues including blank H1 tags, poor sitemap structure, limited code editor access, and minimal schema support. Kajabi excels at course delivery and membership management, but its technical architecture wasn’t built for search visibility, traditional or AI-powered. Coaches using Kajabi for content hubs face an uphill battle making their sites AI-readable.
The Action Checklist
If your platform supports schema markup, start with these implementations:
Add Person schema to your about page (name, credentials, social profiles)
Implement Article schema on blog posts (author, publish date, headline)
Use FAQ schema for common questions
Add Service schema to offering pages
Enable breadcrumb markup for site structure
If your platform limits schema capabilities, prioritize what you can control: publish consistently, strengthen author credentials, update content regularly, and consider migration to a platform that supports long-term AI visibility.
The citation test is simple: when AI engines search for expertise in your domain, does your site provide the structured signals they need to cite you with confidence? If not, you’re competing with one hand behind your back, and the gap will only widen as AI search adoption accelerates.
Sources
Hashmeta. (2025). “How AI Engines Cite Your Content: ChatGPT, Perplexity & Claude.” Retrieved from https://hashmeta.com/ai-search-optimisation-guide/ai-citation-mechanics-chatgpt-perplexity-claude/
Get Passionfruit. (2025). “Schema Markup for AI Search | Boost Ecommerce Visibility.” Retrieved from https://www.getpassionfruit.com/blog/how-structured-data-increases-search-visibility-on-ai-search-engines-schema-markup-for-ai
LLMs Central. (2025). “Complete Guide to Monitoring ChatGPT, Perplexity & Claude.” Retrieved from https://llmscentral.com/blog/how-to-track-ai-citations-complete-guide
Writesonic. (2025). “Why Structured Data in AI Search Matters More Than Ever.” Retrieved from https://writesonic.com/blog/structured-data-in-ai-search
Google Search Central. (2025). “Top ways to ensure your content performs well in Google’s AI-powered search.” Retrieved from https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2025/05/succeeding-in-ai-search
LiquidWeb. (2025). “Wix vs Squarespace vs WordPress: The ultimate showdown.” Retrieved from https://www.liquidweb.com/wordpress/vs/wix-vs-squarespace/
DSers. (2025). “Wix vs. Squarespace vs. WordPress: The 2025 Decision Guide.” Retrieved from https://www.dsers.com/blog/wix-vs-squarespace-vs-wordpress/
Disenyorita. (2025). “Squarespace vs Wix Studio vs WordPress: Which CMS Is Really Worth the SEO Switch.” Retrieved from https://www.disenyorita.com/post/squarespace-vs-wix-studio-vs-wordpress-which-cms-is-really-worth-the-seo-switch
Trustworthy Digital. (2025). “Which CMS is Best for SEO in 2025? Top 14 Platforms.” Retrieved from https://trustworthydigital.com/articles/insights/which-cms-is-best-for-seo/
Studio for Digital Growth. (2025). “Kajabi SEO: How To Get Found, Rank Higher, And Attract Clients.” Retrieved from https://studiofordigitalgrowth.com/blog/kajabi-seo-review/
LinkedIn. (2025). “How To Improve SEO Kajabi website 2025.” Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-improve-seo-kajabi-website-2025-al-hasan-sarkar-7lsmc
SeoProfy. (2025). “10 Best CMS for SEO in 2025.” Retrieved from https://seoprofy.com/blog/best-cms-for-seo/
Want more like this?
Get weekly insights on coach infrastructure.




